Search for: "State v. Mai X." Results 481 - 500 of 3,553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2012, 9:08 am by Madelaine Lane
Yesterday, the Michigan Supreme Court denied two applications for leave to appeal and held two cases in abeyance pending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Chaidez v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE X Everything found in the possession of the fugitive criminal at the time of his arrest, whether being the proceeds of the crime or offence, or which may be material as evidence in making proof of the crime, shall, so far as practicable, according to the laws of either of the Contracting Parties, be delivered up with his person at the time of the surrender. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 1:22 pm
An appeal that says "You should keep X secret" may not only lose, but be itself counterproductive as well. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:42 am by Lisa Kömives
  Judge Harvey Bartle wrote the opinion in Barnes v. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 12:13 pm by Tobias Thienel
But the permission clauses of the Convention never say 'if States wish to do this, they may do X'. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:31 am by Kathryn Mantoan
Some states have placed additional restrictions on the circumstances in which employers can use the “bona fide factor other than [x]” defense. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States, with an amendment, on May 25, 1911. [read post]