Search for: "State v. Mark A. Miller" Results 481 - 500 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Miller, Penn State University: From Dayton to Dover: The Rhetorical Evolution of American Anti-Evolutionism. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:53 pm by S2KM Limited
Henderson" Marketing NSSTA: Business Communications - LuAnn Reeb SSP Marketing to Personal Injury Attorneys - Joe Didier Electronic Media and Social Networking - Mark Wahlstrom Recommended resources S2 wiki - "S2 and KM" Web 2.0 for Lawyers wiki Practice Improvement and New Products NSSTA: CSSC Continuing Education Online - Karen Meyers; Kathy Moghadas SSP Dissecting a Settlement Plan - Jack Meligan; Joseph Tombs Non-qualified Assignments -… [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 4:53 pm by John Elwood
  Those two cases are the consecutively numbered Miller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court concluded in District of Columbia v Heller, 554 US 570 (2008), that “arms” refers to “weapons of offence, or armour of defence,” or “any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes into his hands, or useth in wrath to cast at or strike another,” id at 647 (quotation marks and citations omitted)—terms that cover more than just guns. [read post]
17 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
In each of the last two U.S. congressional sessions, Senator Mark R. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 8:43 pm
Prentky, Sexual Predator Laws: A Two-Decade Retrospective Mary Graw Leary, Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Surratt 1 v. (1895) DeWitt, David Miller. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 3:17 pm
  Thomas McCarthy's seminal treatise on trademark law states his "who are you, what are you" test. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Miller, 09-981), a plea by the g [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 12:36 pm by Michelle Yeary
Under principles of implied preemption, therefore, private litigants may not bring a state-law claim against a defendant when the state-law claim is in substance (even if not in form) a claim for violating the FDCA[.]Id. at *5 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]