Search for: "State v. Minor" Results 481 - 500 of 16,246
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2017, 11:17 am
(In this regard, some enlightening facts worth knowing from the opinion:  "Although MLB’s salary guidelines are not publicly available, the plaintiffs, a class of minor league baseball players [] allege MLB requires that all first-year minor league players earn $1,100 per month, Class-A minor league players earn $1,250 per month, Class-AA minor league players earn $1,500 per month, and Class-AAA minor league players earn $2,150 per month.… [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 10:47 pm by Mili Gupta
Among other things, the law: 1) prohibits minors from accessing material encouraging or depicting H&SR or any other type of deviance from one’s sex designated at birth; 2) forbids delivering instruction about the aforesaid information and restricts sex education in registered organizations; and 3) forbids broadcasts exhibiting H&SR while bringing a new rating – Category V (not intended for children) – to any such programming. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:46 am by Wells Bennett
The United States, pursuant to the Federal Government’s constitutionally enumerated power to make treaties, ratified the treaty in 1997. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 2:48 am by Emma Cross
  [1] R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice & Ors [2009] UKSC 9 [2] R (Barclay & Anor) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor, The Committee for the Affairs of Jersey and Guernsey and Her Ma [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
Unlike New York and the vast majority of other states, Delaware has no statute authorizing an oppressed minority shareholder to petition for judicial dissolution or to compel a buy-out. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
The disadvantage of being a minority shareholder in a Delaware closely-held corporation came to the fore last week in Blaustein v. [read post]