Search for: "State v. Music"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,590
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 11:48 am
In 1987, the Washington Court of Appeals considered, and denied, the admissibility of violent writings as evidence; however, courts did not consider the specific question of rap lyrics until the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit heard United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:00 am
Implied consents to trade marks considered in Marussia Communications v Manor Grand Prix Racing [2016] EWHC 809 https://t.co/XUTNTSuHxU -> Major Labels File Copyright Suit To Block Access To Kickass Torrents ♫ https://t.co/smbJlLpxtd https://t.co/kwYn9rzEj9 -> After surprising growth in 2015, music industry seeks fairer revenues https://t.co/XeghoYNVfW -> Review of e-Privacy Directive https://t.co/dP8HQcWb8h -> Fourth Circuit Finds Potential Coverage For Data… [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:53 am
v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 4:06 am
In June in BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) the High Court ruled against the UK Government in a Judicial Review brought by the British Academy of Songwriters, Composers and Authors (BASCA), the Musicians’ Union (MU) and UK Music. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 3:38 am
The company is now heading for IPO and the pre-IPO filing states: "Given the high level of content concentration in the music industry, the market power of a few licensors, and the lack of transparent ownership information for compositions, we may be unable to license a large amount of music or the music of certain popular artists, and our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially harmed" adding that despite "expending… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:25 am
In Arista Records v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
A similar result arose in Canada where the Supreme Court in Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 7:11 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:36 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 10:01 pm
In Envy Hawaii LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
See Bridgeport Music, 410 F.3d 792, 800-01.7. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 7:46 am
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 577 (1994). [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:31 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:57 am
” (United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 9:53 am
In Elektra v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 10:18 am
Carovillano v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Global Tel*Link https://t.co/TKoHjnTXZC -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2016-02-29 https://t.co/BZ5ZETFrWk -> Copyright appeal rejected Miguna v. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 11:27 am
Doe 1 in North Carolina, it was revealed that a North Carolina State University "John Doe" has filed an unlicensed investigation complaint against MediaSentry with the North Carolina Private Protective Services Board, the agency which regulates private investigators in North Carolina.Doe response in BMG v Doe 1Doe brief in Elektra v. [read post]
