Search for: "State v. Music" Results 481 - 500 of 4,605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2022, 6:54 am by Dan Lopez
And then I was fortunate enough with an inquiring mind and got on the cusp of an EdD, to get recruited to Ithaca, actually to work on the academic side where I coordinated their sports music program for about 20 years. [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am by David Bilinsky
On May 12, 2022 the British Columbia Court of Appeal issued reasons in the case of: Trial Lawyers Association of British Columbia v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:49 pm by Bill Marler
Discharged home after negative stool culture despite low platelet count with diagnosis of infectious colitis v. inflammatory bowel disease. [read post]
11 May 2022, 2:32 pm by Giorgio Luceri
Background and analysis of the Judgment are provided by Comparative Patent Remedies.In the United States, there is a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright IPKat has published Part 1 of its deep-dive into brand protection in the Metaverse, following the explosion of brands taking advantage of the increased consumer engagement in the virtual realm. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In 1977, in GTE Sylvania, the Courtheld that vertical customer and territorial restraints should be judged under the rule of reason.[17] In 1979, in BMI, it held that a blanket license issued by a clearinghouse of copyright owners that set a uniform price and prevented individual negotiation with licensees was a necessary precondition for the product and was thus subject to the rule of reason.[18] In 1984, in Jefferson Parish, the Court rejected automatic application of the per se rule to tying.[19]… [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:56 pm by Eugene Volokh
Community for Creative Non-Violence (1984) (requiring that a facially content-neutral ban on camping must be "justified without reference to the content of the regulated speech"); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:45 am by SCOTUStalk
(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud) Listen now on Acast. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
C. v Fink, Weinberger, Fredman, Berman & Lowell, P. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The music artist Four Tet is suing his record label Domino Recording Company for breach of contract in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court. [read post]