Search for: "State v. Owings" Results 481 - 500 of 9,936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2008, 1:09 pm
A California state appellate court recently ruled that an insurer owed no duty of defense or indemnification to a subcontractor for a lawsuit involving cross-claims between the subcontractor and general contractor. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Supreme Court unanimously held in Sheriff v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 11:35 am by H. Scott Leviant
Only where the claims can strictly “be asserted by pluralistic entities as such,” id., or, stated differently, the defendant “owes an obligation to the group of plaintiffs as a group and not to the individuals severally,” will a common and undivided interest exist, Gibson v. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Among the rulings involving Sand, a 2002 decision of the Appellate Division Second Department, in Sand v. [read post]