Search for: "State v. Pac"
Results 481 - 500
of 726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2012, 8:19 pm
The Supreme Court on Friday stayed a Montana Supreme Court's ruling upholding the Montana state PAC requirement for corporate campaign expenditures, even in the face of Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
” For example, Newt Gingrich’s patron Sheldon Adelson and Rick Santorum’s patron Foster Friess are individuals, not corporations; they are currently contributing through Super PACs protected by Citizens United, but they otherwise could spend on their own even without that decision. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
13 Asia Pac. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 2:18 am
Supreme Court stated in its 2010 Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:03 pm
Most noticeably, Stephen Colbert and his Super PAC, “Making A Better Tomorrow, Tomorrow” have made fun of the decision. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
” The Court found in contrast to the “complexity and ambiguity” of restrictions for federal PACs, PACs formed and maintained in the state are “easily implemented” by the filing of “simple and straight-forward forms or reports. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:28 am
Floyd said no—individuals could always spend as much as they wanted on elections since Buckley v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
Super PACs? [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Union Pac. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:49 am
The idea that five unelected judges understand political corruption better than the United States Congress is absurd, and the notion that Super-PACs are “independent” of the candidates has proven to be a ludicrous legal fiction. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 4:58 pm
Citizens United, with an assist from a 1976 decision Buckley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
Although the Justices are in their mid-term recess, coverage of the Court continues to focus on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:25 am
San Diego at night The United States District Court for the Southern District of California has issued an opinion in Thalheimer v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:05 pm
The protests marked the two-year anniversary Saturday of the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
SpeechNow v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:43 am
SpeechNow v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
Pac Anchor Transportation, S194388, 195 Cal.App.4th 765. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
It is an actual ban, as there is no PAC alternative for foreigners. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 12:51 pm
And Republican Party v. [read post]
