Search for: "State v. Pace" Results 481 - 500 of 1,930
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2011, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
31 May 2015, 12:32 pm by Carl Neff
 Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
17 May 2011, 4:09 am by Eugene Volokh
Article V: “To All Intents and Purposes”Proposals to amend the Constitution have arisen in a variety of context in the last decade, quickening in pace as the ideological gulf within our society widens. [read post]
28 May 2012, 5:08 am by Anita Davies
However, the judgment in Lukaszewski & Ors, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20, handed down by the Supreme Court last week, appears to offer a ray of hope to applicants facing short time limits. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[v] The court also considered Delaware’s strong interest in providing a forum for disputes regarding the internal affairs of LLCs formed under its laws. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm by Florian Mueller
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
Less noticed is the fact the court has done so at about the same pace that states have created an alternative that makes the death penalty pointless, along with the controversy that it generates. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:02 pm
PACE International Union (Petition, BIO, Reply): does a company that sponsors its own pension plan have a legal duty to consider merging it with another plan as a way to end the plan while carrying on the benefits. 05-85, Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:50 am by Staci Zaretsky
‘That’ just seems to have a better pace to it. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:30 am by Ilya Somin
Numerous states, northern and southern, banned interracial marriage at the time the amendment was adopted, and the Supreme Court unanimously endorsed the constitutionality of anti-miscegenation laws in Pace v. [read post]