Search for: "State v. Pounds"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2010, 5:04 am
The landlord was ordered to pay £3400, being the deposit and 3 x penalty. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
Of the assets then valued at £25.8 million, it was agreed that the wife would receive £11 million (43%) and the husband would retain £14.5 million (57%). [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:50 am
A recent California appellate court decision (People v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am
State and federal authorities are often hundreds of miles away, without the local resources to investigate crimes. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 11:03 am
The 10% Simmons v Castle uplift gave a total on general damages of £80,387.29 On the deposit protection, the landlord was ordered to replay the £1,100 deposit, and three times the deposit in respect of both the original tenancy, and when it became a statutory periodic, totalling £6,600. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 4:31 pm
(d) The judge was wrong to reject MGN’s submission that damages for breach of privacy are compensation for injured feelings and are not intended to mark wrongdoing, such damages being vindicatory in effect and therefore contrary to the principles stated inLumba v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm
These features are inconsistent with the price stated in the contract for the sale of the property and thus, he submits, the collateral contract is void under section 2. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 1:18 pm
In a landmark case, the United States Supreme Court in Young v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
As the Comptroller's determination — finding that Breslin was not permanently incapacitated from performing the duties of a light-duty assignment — is supported by substantial evidence, it will not be disturbed (see Matter of Sweeney v DiNapoli, 88 AD3d 1051, 1051 [2011]; Matter of Murray v New York State Comptroller, 84 AD3d 1681, 1682-1683 [2011]; Matter of Pascale v DiNapoli, 84 AD3d at 1680; Matter of Roache v Hevesi, 38 AD3d 1036,… [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:19 pm
In an interesting criminal case, United States v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
” Both departments have been fined £1 million. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:15 am
That'd be small solace while you were having your nether regions pounded (or whatever), but maybe it'd nonetheless be some solace. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 10:47 pm
” That’s precisely what happened according to Angela Harris in Harris v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
The mis-selling of these insurance products created a liability for Sureterm to its customers worth approximately £2.4 million. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:34 am
Facts: This case (Clark v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:50 pm
However, the judge stated that the “uncertain state of the law” meant that his conclusion on this point could only be provisional ([132]) until the CJEU gives guidance in Sky v SkyKick on what circumstances may constitute bad faith. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am
The adjudication states: “The article under complaint was a feature on Gary Dobson and David Norris, who had recently been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. [read post]
