Search for: "State v. Powell"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,439
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2009, 9:45 am
In Oregon v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 5:15 am
Thornton, 514 U.S. 779, 783 (1995) (first quoting Powell v. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 4:02 pm
(It's the fun part of Marbury v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:34 am
The district court held that although the state court had not complied with either state law or the requirements imposed by the Court's 1986 decision in Ford v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:56 am
SCOTUS has come down with its first opinion of the term, holding in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 7:11 am
Sila Luis v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:59 pm
In the recent SCOTUSblog symposium on the upcoming Fisher v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court issued its opinion in McGirt v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:12 am
Jogee corrected the historic mistake in Chan Wing-Siu [1984] UKPC 27 and R v Powell/English [1997] UKHL 57 of equating foresight with intent to assist in cases of alleged secondary participation. [read post]
22 May 2018, 10:33 am
In any event, Lewis Powell may be the most important justice of the last half-century, not because of his "constitutional decisions," which are all over the place--see, e.g., Rodriguez, McCleskey v. [read post]
17 May 2021, 11:01 am
That left the ninth justice, Justice Lewis Powell, to decide the outcome. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 6:59 am
Powell, 379 U.S. 48 (1964). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
In a case having potentially enormous implications on foreclosure actions in New York State and throughout the country, the Second Department in Bank of New York v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:51 am
CJLF has filed this friend-of-the-court brief in Maples v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
(Able v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:52 pm
Flood v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:19 am
He passed the gun to Powell. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557, 566 (1980) Powell J (for the Court) held that, in such cases, a four-part analysis has developed: At the outset, we must determine whether the expression is protected by the First Amendment. [read post]
