Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2021, 12:50 pm
” Georgia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:39 pm
United States oral arguments. [read post]
5 May 2014, 3:07 pm
“In other words, Defendant asks the Court to permit the Government to continue to provide funds to Defendant-Intervenor even if Defendant cannot certify that those funds will flow to NPO Energomash and/or other entities that may be under the control of Deputy Prime Minister Rogozin,” the document states. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Tamar Hostovsky Brandes and Idit Shafran Gittleman assessed the Israeli Supreme Court’s decision in Tziam v. the Prime Minister, a case concerning five Palestinian women living in Gaza, who are related to Hamas members and were initially denied permission to enter Jerusalem for medical treatment. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:17 am
ICYMI: Last Weekend on Lawfare Jacques Singer-Emery and Patrick McDonnell assessed recent developments at the military commission in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 am
The post Case Review – Campus Contracting Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 9:57 am
V. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:06 am
See Prime Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:29 pm
Bankers Ass’n v. [read post]
1 Jan 2020, 1:33 am
This eventuality, as has been discussed in the foregoing analysis, is very well plausible, with the prime example being the ratio in IFFCO. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 4:23 am
The requesting party must demonstrate that the court has prime facie jurisdiction over the case. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Alternatively, such proceedings may be brought before the courts of the Member State where the data subject has his or her habitual residence, unless the controller or processor is a public authority of a Member State acting in the exercise of its public powers. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:40 am
New Prime, Inc. v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:30 am
(Editors’ Note: See the CAFA Law Blog analysis of Gardner’s companion case, Helms v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm
Jackson Hewitt as a prime example of this skepticism and also notes that Kentucky and New Jersey law both preclude recover for speculative or illusory damages. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:00 am
As Lord Bingham put it in R (Gentle) v Prime Minister [2008] 1 AC 1356 at [8] there are: “issues which judicial tribunals have traditionally been very reluctant to entertain because they recognise their limitations as suitable bodies to resolve them. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 10:33 am
By Eric Goldman LTVN Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
Judge Clark considered the T-bill rate as too low, the state rate (or the infringer's borrowing rate) as too high, but the prime rate, compounded quarterly (as opposed to annually), to be just right. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
The Dunlop Letter provided a prime opportunity for Strandwitz and Kniskern to question that inventorship determination, yet they failed to do so. [read post]
