Search for: "State v. R. J. H."
Results 481 - 500
of 1,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
By the time of the hearing before HHJ Cryan J had produced a witness statement which appeared to make H his agent in the case, however the precise nature of the relationship and the consnet given was not clear. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:47 am
By the time of the hearing before HHJ Cryan J had produced a witness statement which appeared to make H his agent in the case, however the precise nature of the relationship and the consnet given was not clear. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Jump to County: A-B C D-G H-K L-M O-S T-W Jump to City: A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 5:11 am
For more Taxes A to Z, check out: A is for Affordable Care Act Reporting B is for Back Pay C is for Canceled Debt D is for Dependents E is for Eligible Rollover Distributions F is for Fat Finger Error G is for GI Bill H is for Harvesting Losses I is for Investment Income Expense J is for Junk Bonds K is for Strike Price L is for Late Filing & Late Payment Penalties M is for Marginal Tax Rate N is for NSF O is for Over-The-Counter Medications P is for Pease Limitations Q is for… [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:24 am
Now to find someone who wants to have the state statute unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:02 am
V. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm
In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f. bonuses and royalties; g. alimony and… [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 5:43 pm
L’Esperance, 195 N.J. 247, 263 (2008)(J. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 2:39 pm
(Jonathan H. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
" In Nicole R. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 6:12 am
The case began in September of 2010, when Special Agents from the Department of Homeland security found child pornography on a computer belonging to Robert J. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 10:15 am
” Bivens v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:15 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
§ 3162(a)(2); United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 3:02 am
J. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
