Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 481 - 500
of 13,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2009, 5:03 am
Hayden sought to introduce evidence that the victim was a registered sex offender in Minnesota, but the trial court excluded the evidence. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 1:54 pm
They quoted Sibron v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
Whether, in light of this Court’s prior precedents, particularly State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:12 am
Following hearings pertaining to that motion, the trial court entered an order on March 17, 2011, directing appellant to register as a sex offender. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
The People's Republic of Bangladesh v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:04 pm
In Meredith v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:52 am
Andrew v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 7:30 am
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 7:05 am
Supreme Court previously held, in Smiley v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:10 am
Of the 74 registered rescues as of March 16, 2017, none appear to be equine rescue facilities. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
This term, the sleeper case is Department of State v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:27 am
Supreme Court, in the case of National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:53 pm
Webinar Narrative: The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments on May 11, 2020 in McGirt v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 3:03 am
Doe v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:51 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Firstrand argued that parts of the mark in question were obscured and unidentifiable and presented a photocopy of the Register in evidence. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 9:11 am
Evidence of third-party use of similar marks was “thin” (FocusVision Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
The Board erred by failing to consider whether the registered BROOKLYN BREW SHOP mark has acquired distinctiveness for beer-making kits. [read post]
