Search for: "State v. Robertson" Results 481 - 500 of 713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 6:33 pm by Lyle Denniston
Harvey Leroy Sossamon III is a prisoner in the Robertson Unit of Texas state prison system, in Abilene. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am by charonqc
He defended the last two cases brought for blasphemy in the UK against Salman Rushdie (R (ex parte Choudhury) v Bow Street Magistrates Court [1991] 1 QB 429) and Gay News (R v Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617). [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 8:33 am by admin
  In the ruling, Justice Robertson states,   Justice Robertson: San Antonio born and bred   “Thus, this case revolves around when the lien attached on the property. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 12:57 am by Adam Wagner
An interesting discussion of Geoffrey Robertson QC and others’ argument that the Pope should be arrested as he is not a head of state subject to diplomatic immunity. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:33 am by Benjamin Wittes
I posted earlier a summary by Larkin Reynolds of the coming argument in Salahi v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am by INFORRM
” However in Kaye v Robertson (1991) 19 IPR 147 a journalist had gained unauthorised access to the hospital bedside of the actor Gordon Kaye. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am by Simon Fodden
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Angela Swan
His analysis of the result in LAC Minerals Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:11 pm by Adam Wagner
After the Election there was talk of spurned voters pursuing claims on the basis that the state had breached their human rights. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:34 pm by NL
That conclusion, which, in our judgment, follows from the plain meaning of subsection (4), is supported by the authorities: see in particular Wilson v First County Trust Ltd [2001] QB 407, Watchtower Investments Ltd v Payne [2001] EWCA Civ 1159, [2001] GCCR 3055 and Wilson v Robertsons (London) Ltd [2005] EWHC 1425 (Ch), [2006] 1 WLR 1248. [read post]