Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2024, 4:20 am
Compare such honesty with the shell game played currently in many states where the sentence publicly imposed means little or nothing. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 1:18 pm
Here's what the Court of Appeal says about it:"In Property Reserve v. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 7:26 am
Prezant Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 8:22 am
Gaminde v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:35 am
Board-Tech Electronic Co. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
The court found a substantial state interest in curbing youth smoking that would be directly advanced by limiting marketing of tobacco products. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
A method of analyzing a DNA sample that contains genetic material from at least two individuals to determine a probability distribution of genotype likelihood or weight in the sample, comprising the steps: (a) amplifying the DNA sample to produce an amplification product comprising DNA fragments, wherein each allele at a locus is amplified to generate relative amounts of DNA fragments of the alleles that are proportional to the relative amounts of template DNA from the… [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:32 am
The issue at the center of Maryland v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees and South Dakota v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:15 am
As stated, these individuals would most often be subjected to a urine sample at the request of law enforcement at a given police department or State Police barracks. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:36 am
Norris v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 11:32 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
In the case of State v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:43 pm
In State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 4:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:32 pm
The case is BNSF Railway Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
The Wang II decision follows a remand from the United States Supreme Court which had reversed the original Wang judgment in light of the inconsistencies between the lower courts' rulings and the certification standards the Supreme Court announced in Dukes v. [read post]
