Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 481 - 500
of 15,543
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2009, 5:22 am
Check the Hemi Group, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 11:50 am
Supreme Court handle the appeal in Perry v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 3:14 pm
The case is captioned United States of America v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:46 am
* * *In this case, the United States alleged that, from 2007 to 2020, under the direction and control of its prior management, R&V Associates Ltd. and Ronald Violi, Wheeling Hospital systematically violated the Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute by knowingly and willfully paying improper compensation to referring physicians that was based on the volume or value of the physicians’ referrals or was above fair market value [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
In Negrete v. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 7:55 am
I mention the cost issue here because ‘2 v. 3’ often devolves into ‘2 x $45,000 v. 3 x $45,000. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:05 pm
In the case of Barrett V. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”)(Internally citing to State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:57 am
Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
The case, Davis, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
In the decision of Prokupek v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 7:47 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:06 am
It is well-settled that “[i]f a defendant client’s legal malpractice claim is intertwined with a plaintiff law firm’s claim for legal fees, the plaintiff will not be entitled to summary judgment on its account stated claim” (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013]) and since the “alleged conduct which forms the basis for the malpractice [counterclaims] occurred during the billing period at… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:41 am
Despite the inherent conflict between the two jurisdictions, the United States Supreme Court has declined to take up the issue and settle the split. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:58 am
While attending the DOJ/FTC workshop yesterday, I had a colleague sit in on the initial status hearing in the US v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Nnyanzi v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 18 confirmed the distinction that permission to “settle”, as opposed to permission to stay pending determination of applications, erases the bright-line between a precarious and a secure immigration status. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
He served as counsel in the State of California v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
The state alleged that the registry system created inaccurate and unreliable records that undermined chain of title in that state. [read post]
