Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 481 - 500
of 15,617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2016, 8:25 am
”)(Internally citing to State v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:58 pm
Espenscheid v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 12:30 pm
” State ex rel. [read post]
13 May 2020, 4:05 am
In settling a case brought by a same-sex couple, the state agreed to impose sexual-orientation non discrimination requirements on child-placement agencies that contract with the state. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Judicial Watch v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:57 am
Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 11:46 am
The state alleged that the registry system created inaccurate and unreliable records that undermined chain of title in that state. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 6:00 am
In Negrete v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am
Nnyanzi v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 18 confirmed the distinction that permission to “settle”, as opposed to permission to stay pending determination of applications, erases the bright-line between a precarious and a secure immigration status. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:58 am
While attending the DOJ/FTC workshop yesterday, I had a colleague sit in on the initial status hearing in the US v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:59 am
The case, Davis, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 10:05 pm
In the case of Barrett V. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
15 May 2012, 1:04 am
Following on Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 [Our report] and Lord Jackson’s view on JR costs, the Court of Appeal in M v London Borough of Croydon [2012] EWCA Civ 595 has given general guidance for awarding costs. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 5:06 am
It is well-settled that “[i]f a defendant client’s legal malpractice claim is intertwined with a plaintiff law firm’s claim for legal fees, the plaintiff will not be entitled to summary judgment on its account stated claim” (Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP v Rose, 111 AD3d 453, 454 [1st Dept 2013]) and since the “alleged conduct which forms the basis for the malpractice [counterclaims] occurred during the billing period at… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 3:16 pm
That company (through Bank of America, its successor in interest) settled in 2009 with states charges that it had engaged in consumer fraud in its mortgage lending. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
In the decision of Prokupek v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 7:48 am
He served as counsel in the State of California v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
Or, as in Steller v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:30 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
