Search for: "State v. Sing" Results 481 - 500 of 745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Apr 2019, 8:30 am by Eugene Volokh
[u]sing the Internet ... for the purpose of posting ... electronically written words, images and/or videos which threaten, harass or defame and/or slander the other spouse .... [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In “Ragtop Day,” Jimmy Buffett sings, “Get ourselves a cool one at the Flora-Bama, ya! [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
to pay 23% ongoing royalty for future infringement: Creative Internet Advertising Corp. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
  No doubt there are social scientists today who would sing the praises of same-race child adoption preferences (contra Palmore v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 6:50 am
They take any liberty they choose with the men, amid amusement and applause, while the singing and dancing continue. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
It depends on jurisdiction (heeding presumption state or not), on the facts (drug withdrawn or still on the market), on the doctor (assess confidence, experience). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:21 pm by Guest Blogger
Back in 1834, the Supreme Court decided in Wheaton v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 8:29 am by Richard Hunt
As Bradley Cooper sings in the latest version of A Star if Born, “Maybe it’s time to let the old ways die. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
It is hard to see how.At least since the Supreme Court’s landmark 1943 ruling in West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:57 pm
As a result, on May 27, 2020, the Secretary of State announced that the PRC had fundamentally undermined Hong Kong’s autonomy and certified and reported to the Congress, pursuant to sections 205 and 301 of the United States-Hong Kong Policy Act of 1992, as amended, respectively, that Hong Kong no longer warrants treatment under United States law in the same manner as United States laws were applied to Hong Kong before July 1, 1997. [read post]