Search for: "State v. Singh"
Results 481 - 500
of 848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
See Doherty v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:20 am
In Prakash Singh v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:00 am
Petrella v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 7:03 am
The judge confirmed that the standard of review in this case was irrationality, as set out by Singh J (as he then was) in R(May) v Birmingham CC (2012) EWCA 1399 (Admin). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 9:28 am
Facts: This case (Junger, et al v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:46 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:57 am
Bush and Al-Odah v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 11:58 am
The petitioners had argued that non-recognition of same-sex marriages is violative of Article 14 (equality), article 15 (non-discrimination), article 19 (freedom of speech) and article 21 (right to life).The petitioners cited judgements such as Navtej Singh Johar v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:22 am
Jeremy Leaming at ACSblog notes that with the Court’s decision in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 10:02 am
In the case of State of Bihar v. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
State of Rajasthan & Anr., has reiterated the principle that the arbitral tribunal cannot go beyond the terms of the reference and any attempt to do so would be void and without any jurisdiction. [read post]
29 May 2009, 2:18 pm
Some other notable decisions: Singh v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:27 am
Balbir Singh and Dr. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner’s penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner’s claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:19 am
Mich. 2018) (citing Robin Singh Educ. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 5:33 pm
From Singh v. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:55 am
In Varkey Joseph v. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm
The applications in the case of case of Singh v Singh and the CMC in the Voice Mail interception litigation before Vos J were both adjourned. [read post]
