Search for: "State v. So " Results 481 - 500 of 117,454
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2024, 6:50 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
 So, this argument from the Archive was unsuccessful as well. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
In doing so, it locates s1(2A)[4] as the source of problematic attitudes and decisions, identifying reform of the statutory presumption as the solution to that problem. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:00 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
AFGHAN AND IRAQI ALLIES, UNDER SERIOUS THREAT BECAUSE OF THEIR FAITHFUL SERVICE TO THE UNITED STATES, ON THEIR OWN AND ON BEHALF OF OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:29 am by Ronald Mann
We can only wait for the decision later this month in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am by Jon Choi
United States in the next month or so, possibly deciding the constitutionality of taxes on unrealized capital gains—although Brooks and Gamage’s contribution goes far beyond the current case, especially if it is decided on narrow grounds. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]