Search for: "State v. Trader"
Results 481 - 500
of 854
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2010, 10:36 pm
In Baker v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government [2008] EWCA Civ 141, Dyson LJ, at paragraph 31, Sir John Dyson emphasised that the section 71(1) duty was not a duty to achieve the result of eliminating racial discrimination as such, or to promote equal opportunity, but a duty to have “due regard” to the need to achieve these goals. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:23 am
Illum v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 12:02 pm
– United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:55 am
” Brumfield v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:56 am
Although this view of insider trading can be justified by the policy objectives underlying the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 11:37 pm
The High Court judgment is particularly welcome in terms of how explicitly it states that the ECHR requires reading domestic legislation to recognise non-religious beliefs and in how it debunks many of the objections often given for extending protection in this way. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 3:09 pm
In Silverberg v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:34 pm
First, the Bragg v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
" Wal-Mart v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm
Today the General Court held otherwise after a successful appeal by Tilda from the Board of Appeal decision: Tilda Riceland Private Ltd v OHIM (T304/09). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:36 am
In this piece I will discuss how if at all this provision has been altered by the case of Proctor and Gamble v Office for Harmonisation In the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) ; Known simply as "Baby Dry"; and subsequent cases. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 4:00 am
IA-2204; IC-26299 -Compliance Programs of Investment Companies and Investment Advisers SEC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:37 pm
” Earlier this month, in Braman v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
The decisions of Judge Colin Birss QC in the Patents County Court earlier this year in Dame Vivienne Westwood v Anthony Knight (noted by the IPKat here and here) made fascinating reading. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:23 pm
Many of those subjected to such detention fees (and associated enforcement action) had hoped that the decision of the NSW Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal ("CTTT") in DV Kelly Pty Ltd v China Shipping (Australia) Agency Co Pty Ltd would serve as the basis to cause shipping lines and their agents to review (and reduce) fees and associated enforcement action. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:52 pm
Like Barbour v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Trader Joe's Co., No. 3:16-CV- 2112 (M.D.Pa. 2018 Mariani, J.), the court noted that neither a single sale directed at the forum state nor the fact that the Defendant's products were carried by national retailers was sufficient to establish jurisdiction.9. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
There is a likelihood of confusion between the Marks BETPACK and BETDAQ and the registration of a confusingly similar mark is contrary to the provisions of Community Law prohibiting the registration of the Trade Mark in the State, particularly Council Regulations regarding the registration of trade marks. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 10:49 am
The judge was influenced by a thought experiment: a market trader sells infringing DVDs, among other goods, from a stall he has set up on someone else's land without consent. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am
The Court held that tribal nations had no tradition of selling liquor tax free, therefore Indian traders in Indian country had to get a state liquor license. [read post]
