Search for: "State v. Tran" Results 481 - 500 of 1,096
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States District Court, Southern District, Corpus Christi Division, had that decision to make in a case styled, National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, et, al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm by Karen Gullo
In a victory for transparency in police use of facial recognition, a New Jersey appellate court today ruled that state prosecutors—who charged a man for armed robbery after the technology showed he was a “possible match” for the suspect—must turn over to the defendant detailed information about the face scanning software used, including how it works, source code, and its error rate.Calling facial recognition “a novel and untested technology,” the court in… [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 9:23 am by jmalcolm
Yet in the 2013 Kirtsaeng v Wiley case, such parallel importation was found legal. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by INFORRM
One of the columnists cited by White was Janice Turner, whose many negative articles about trans people (sample headlines: ‘Children Sacrificed to Appease Trans Lobby’ and ‘Trans Ideologists Are Spreading Cod Science’) have caused widespread fury in LGBT circles. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:59 am by Mark Rienzi
GLE Associates) presenting the issue of whether it should revisit its 1979 decision Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 12:41 pm
As the title of Ovid's work, late 14c., Metamorphoseos, from Latin Metamorphoses (plural).transform (v.)mid-14c., "change the form of" (transitive), from Old French transformer (14c.), from Latin transformare "change in shape, metamorphose," from trans "across, beyond" (see trans-) + formare "to form" (see form (v.)). [read post]
27 Apr 2025, 12:03 am by Frank Cranmer
We will deliver a full trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:28 pm
For the reasons hereinafter stated, we AFFIRM that decision. 07a0124p.06 2007/04/05  Cress v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:54 pm by Randee Iles and Rebecca Guidry
Trans-Pecos Pipeline, L.L.C. where the United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit stated that “when private parties have the unrestrained ability to decide whether another citizen’s property rights can be restricted, any resulting deprivation happens without ‘process of law. [read post]