Search for: "State v. Walsh"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2022, 12:38 pm
On July 28, 2022, in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:45 am
Yesterday the court released a unanimous opinion in Lomax v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
” At Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Ruthann Robson notes that judges in several lower courts have relied on Justice Scalia’s dissent in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:47 am
United States Postal Service, in which they will consider whether the federal government can challenge patents under the America Invents Act. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:09 am
" The cases in support of these propositions are Walsh v. [read post]
30 Mar 2021, 5:00 am
In setting forth this law, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in this case quoted extensively from the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in the case of Walsh Estate of Walsh v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:34 am
City of Philadelphia (Leslie Griffin, Verdict) On Fulton v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
The other by Erin Sheley is entitled: Dead Men Walking: Why Kennedy v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am
Prominent among the docketed cases is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 3:19 pm
Among the cases cited ihn this opinion by Bankruptcy Judge Walsh on these issues include the following: Majowski v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:24 pm
Walsh, 797 A.2d 353, 360 (Pa. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
For this blog’s Academic round-up, Amanda Frost examines some of the academic commentary on the Fourth Amendment’s applicability to GPS surveillance, an issue the Court will take up in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 11:19 am
With respect to the first counterclaim, defendants submitted evidence establishing the reasonable value of their services (see generally Phillips Nizer Benjamin Krim & Ballon v Chu, 240 AD2d 231, 659 N.Y.S.2d 4), and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact with respect to defendants' entitlement to the fees sought (see generally DiPlacidi v Walsh, 243 AD2d 335, 664 N.Y.S.2d 537; [**3] Pirro & Monsell v Freddolino, 204 AD2d 613, 614… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:46 pm
Just Film, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 3:06 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in Brumfield v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:44 pm
This morning, the Court issued its decision in Burwell v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports on the grant in in Janus v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am
The most high-profile grant was in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 3:20 am
Judge Walsh granted Circle Star's motion to transfer the case to the Northern District of California. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 11:18 am
In so doing, the state apparently realized the futility of claiming that its expansive buffer zone law was supported by Hill v. [read post]
