Search for: "State v. Woods"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,983
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2020, 12:13 pm
Wood v. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Krumwiede, et al. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am
Similarly, we agree with the Supreme Court’s determination to grant that branch of the motion of the BNYM defendants which was pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss the second cause of action against BNYM as trustee (see Wood v Villanueva, 175 AD3d 1465; Zuniga v BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., 147 AD3d 882; Acocella v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 139 AD3d 647, 649; Jahan v U.S.Bank N.A., 127 AD3d 926, 927). [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 10:30 am
Woods v. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 11:01 pm
And if you want a deep dive on the issue, you should read my friend Chris Sager’s outstanding book “United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
New on the podcast: Black Lives Matter, a qualified immunity cert petition (Kelsay v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
In Cascades Containerboard Packaging v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Eyster v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 4:40 pm
Section 9 – Action against persons not domiciled in the UK or an EU/Lugano Convention State Section 9 provides that the court will not have jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim where the prospective defendant is resident outside of the UK, European Union, or the Lugano Convention states (Norway, Switzerl [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 2:58 am
Wood, earlier here, here, and here] Also on the topic of jury nullification, is that an appropriate metaphor for things happening with the Senate and impeachment? [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:48 pm
Simon v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 5:06 pm
Earp (Florida, Brevard County), in Arcadier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 7:08 am
Likewise, the parties have also requested a three-month stay in connection with the deadline for dispositive motion (CFTC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 11:31 am
United States, which seeks a court-ordered plan... [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 8:00 am
Bent v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 10:31 pm
There is no better example of this interaction than the Shape v Supreme litigation ongoing before Dutch courts, with the most recent decision in this dispute rendered in December 2019 in Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (“SHAPE”) et al v Supreme Site Service GmbH et al (Supreme), COURT OF APPEAL OF ‘s-HERTOGENBOSCH, Case No. 200/216/570/01, Ruling of 10 December 2019 (the ‘CoA Decision’). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 8:00 am
Lowe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Two witnesses—a former State Department official and Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS—declined to be interviewed, but there is no suggestion in the report, or in the inspector general’s testimony, that this altered the outcome of the investigation. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
