Search for: "Stephens v. The United States of America" Results 481 - 500 of 582
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm by Lawrence Solum
The ratification debates and Federalist Papers can be supplemented by evidence of ordinary usage and by the constructions placed on the Constitution by the political branches and the states in the early years after its adoption. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm by Roshonda Scipio
Miller, editor ; with Louis Aucoin.Washington, DC : United States Institute of Peace Press, 2010.Constitutional LawKF4930 .O75 2010The origins of the necessary and proper clause / Gary Lawson ... [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am by JB
It is indeed a most powerful idea.One reason why protestant constitutionalism develops this way in the United States is that, as Stephen Griffin has pointed out, the Constitution is ultimately self-enforcing. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist)     Australia I thought cats were colour blind... [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm by Duncan
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:33 am by thejaghunter
Clinefelter, San Bernardino, CA EMCS Stephen Kiser, Elkhart, IN FC1 Gregory L. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
The company has agreed to pay a civil penalty of $310,000, of which $155,000 will be paid to the United States and the other $155,000 to Virginia. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
, Change for America: A Progressive Blueprint for the 44th President (Basic Books). 2001. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  It is worth noting that in the recent United States Supreme Court case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 11:19 am by JB
It places one of the key holdings of Dred Scott v. [read post]