Search for: "Steven Mazie"
Results 481 - 500
of 530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie remarks that after Husted v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist and Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, and First Mondays (podcast). [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 3:42 am
” Steven Mazie weighs in as well, contending that, “however the justices are about to rule, court commentary from the president’s bully pulpit is, at best, fruitless. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 7:18 am
” At The Economist, Steven Mazie weighs in on the oral argument; at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, he dissects the argument further, concluding that “I do not think that Justices Samuel Alito and Scalia will ultimately vote to save Obamacare. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
” Additional coverage comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR and Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
” For The Economist, Steven Mazie highlights the “tension between principle and practicality” in Chiafalo v. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 4:38 am
Steven Mazie at The Economist predicts that Senate Republicans will dissolve the filibuster so that Trump can “have his way with the empty chair,” and speculates that Tuesday’s “vote may have changed retirement plans for Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 83 and Stephen Breyer, 78, the elder liberals on a court that is destined to swing to the right. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” Steven Mazie writes at The Economist that if the abortion providers lose, “the consequences could be profound, emboldening anti-abortion legislators in many states to pass new laws squeezing access to abortion. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am
Coverage comes from Bill Mears of Fox News, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, and Jordan Fabian of The Hill, while Dara Lind has an explainer on the case for Vox and Steven Mazie does the same for The Economist. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am
” Steven Mazie of the Economist says Chief Justice John Roberts employed a “pox-on-both-your-houses analysis” before kicking the Mazars subpoenas back to the lower courts. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:03 am
In The Economist, Steven Mazie calls the argument “a puzzling exercise in interpretative hair-splitting. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 4:07 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie also looks at the concurring opinions, noting that “Justice Ginsburg’s final move citing the committee report ignited a small but telling tiff between two subsets of jurists” about the use of legislative history. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie explains that “[a]ll the justices seem to agree that Congress can write a new law targeting flat-out profanity or vulgarity as long as only modes of expression—not ideas themselves—are cabined. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
” Additional coverage of the argument in Weyerhaeuser comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Bill Mears at Fox News, and Ellen Gilmer at E&E News, who reports that “justices from both ends of the ideological spectrum pushed to understand just where the limits are on the government’s authority. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
Commentary comes from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am
” At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[t]he justices have bought themselves some time, but they are unlikely to find relief from the question of how far legislatures can go in rigging elections. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:05 am
At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie reviews Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s recent remarks in his home state of Kentucky that he would fill a Supreme Court vacancy in 2020 should one arise during the presidential election. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am
” Briefly: At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie observes that “[f]or the first time since 1996 it is July and the Supreme Court still has cases to rule on[; w]ith eight decisions to go in a term disrupted by covid-19, the justices are saving some closely watched cases for last. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:05 am
” At The Economist’s Espresso blog, Steven Mazie notes that “[p]recedent is not friendly to Mr Trump’s plea[:] When Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton faced other predicaments involving the separation of powers, the Supreme Court decided against both, unanimously. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am
Briefly: At The Economist’s Democracy in America blog, Steven Mazie discusses the federal government’s highly unusual request for Supreme Court review of a lower-court decision preventing the federal government from dismantling the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, even though the appeals court has not yet ruled on the case, remarking that “[t]here is a lot of chutzpah packed into the DoJ brief. [read post]
