Search for: "Stevens v. Thomas"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,095
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 3:04 pm
The opinion in Texas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:04 am
Supreme Court in an argued case: The Court today issued its ruling in Salazar v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 11:28 pm
To be sure, he didn't embrace the living Constitution as such, but nearly all of what he said as a matter of general jurisprudence could have been said by Ginsburg or Stevens, and much of it by Brennan or Marshall. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
Justice Thomas' brief, seven-page majority's opinion just reinforces the strict definition of the "clearly established" requirement that has been around since Justice O'Connor's opinion in Williams v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:32 pm
Tags: Art Spitzer, Clarence Thomas, Constitutional Law, Dick Cheney, Indianapolis, Iraq, Justice Stephen Breyer, Matt Kaiser, Qualified immunity, Reichle v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
The 9th Justice, Clarence Thomas, filed a concurrence/dissent inverse to that of Stevens and Ginsburg: Thomas agreed officials were immune, but disagreed that strip searching the teenager violated the Constitution. [read post]
13 Nov 2006, 8:59 am
Alito, Jr., Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
Justice Souter filed a concurring opinion joined by Justice Stevens. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:17 pm
Thankfully, the AP…Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, Crime, Graham v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
The closest Justice Thomas comes is citing to Clark v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Monday’s decisions in Brown v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 7:41 pm
Secondly does it bother anybody that Justice Thomas cannot find any precedent for TINKER v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 5:25 pm
J., and KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., joined that opinion in full; STEVENS, SOUTER, and GINSBURG, JJ., joined it as to all but Part II-B; and BREYER, J., joined as to all but footnote 1 and Part II-B. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:01 pm
In the landmark case Hamdan v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 8:51 am
Check the Renico v. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
Amendolara, Steven R. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
Much about today's decision was not unusual: The Court was split five-to-four, along typical ideological lines (Thomas, Roberts, Alito, Kennedy, and Scalia in the majority, Sotomayor, Breyer, Ginsburg, and Stevens dissenting). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 5:30 am
King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm
J., and STEVENS, SCALIA, KENNEDY, THOMAS, and ALITO, JJ., Part II of which was joined by ROBERTS, C. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
