Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice"
Results 481 - 500
of 700
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 12 Jun 2017. [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 4:13 am
Preston noted that “the administration sought the guidance from the Department of Justice on the applicability and impact of the 30-day notice requirement under these circumstances and received guidance from the Department of Justice,” and that the guidance was conveyed “not by means of a formal memorandum opinion, but rather by e-mail exchange principally. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm
” I do believe, as Justice John Paul Stevens has said, it is only because the Court has moved more to the right that he would be viewed as a liberal. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In Biden v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 9:03 pm
” In a working paper, Steven Salop, professor at the Georgetown University Law Center, and several coauthors discussed the impacts of Ohio v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
United States. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Stewart, of the Department of Justice. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
The spectacle of, say, Justice John Paul Stevens (whom I much admired) serving for 34 years until he retired at the age of 90, is unknown not only abroad, but even more to the point, everywhere else in the United States (save, perhaps, Rhode Island). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 1:01 am
Justice [Indiana Supreme Court] Steven H. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am
Much is poured into the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
I prefer to cite you to Justice Stevens' dissent: Justice Stevens with whom Justice Souter and Justice Ginsburg join as to Parts I and II, and with whom Justice Breyer joins as to Parts II and III, dissenting. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm
"n an unusual move, a group of former Justice Department prosecutors and civil rights officials led by former solicitor general Paul Clement is asking the Supreme Court for time to argue on behalf of a criminal defendant in a case of prosecutorial misconduct that the justices will hear on October 6.It is rare, but not unheard of, for the Court to grant argument time to non-parties to a case, except for federal or state government entities.But… [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
United States Bloomberg had a piece “Fox News Faces $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Over Voting Machine Fraud Claims”. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
These are known as “John Stings” or “Reverse Stings,” and technically referred to by the Department of Justice as “demand reduction interventions. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
In issuing this ruling, however, Justice Stevens noted that Ms. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:15 am
United States. [read post]
5 May 2018, 7:43 am
Saturday’s Lawfare podcast featured a recording of last Thursday’s Georgetown Law panel on norms governing relations between the White House and Justice Department. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
United States. [read post]
