Search for: "Stevens v. United States Department Of Justice" Results 481 - 500 of 700
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2010, 6:32 am by Beth Graham
Breyer is probably the only avowed true purposivist on the United States Supreme Court, although certain other members of the Court may be influenced by purposivism to at least some degree. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am by James Bickford
United States, the other case to be argued this morning, and lays out the conflict implicit in Pepper: between utilitarian and retributivist approaches to sentencing. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Beth Graham
  Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, joined by Associate Justices John Paul Stevens and Steven G. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 2:51 pm by Anthony Lake
The article states that, since 1997, federal courts have determined that Department of Justice attorneys violated laws or ethical rules in some 201 cases, including the duty expressed by Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland over 70 years ago in Berger v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am by Amanda Rice
United States (and its consolidated companion, The Boeing Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Concepcion (Federal Arbitration Act preemption of California rule that a waiver of class arbitration in a consumer contract may be unenforceable) Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:54 am by David G. Badertscher
Senator Says Re-banning Animal Crush Videos 'A Virtual Certainty' A speedy Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this morning paid notice to animal rights groups that hope to flatten a resurgence of "animal crush" videos, an industry they say has regained ground after the United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
Sound like something departing Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens could have written? [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 8:26 pm by Steve Hall
"n an unusual move, a group of former Justice Department prosecutors and civil rights officials led by former solicitor general Paul Clement is asking the Supreme Court for time to argue on behalf of a criminal defendant in a case of prosecutorial misconduct that the justices will hear on October 6.It is rare, but not unheard of, for the Court to grant argument time to non-parties to a case, except for federal or state government entities.But… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
United States Dept. of Interior, 982 F.2d 1332, 1338 (9th Cir.1992). [read post]