Search for: "Super Delegates"
Results 481 - 500
of 607
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2008, 2:34 pm
Why counting super delegates is now beneficial to Obama. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 6:36 pm
Obama, however, has 1,406 pledged elected delegates, or 53%, to Clinton’s 1,249, or 47%. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
If funding an ELECTION, where no money goes to the voters themselves, can be questioned, what do we make of giving money DIRECTLY to the "voters" (the super delegates in this case)? [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 5:08 pm
" That means they want Obama to win it with VOTERS, not super delegates. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 9:03 am
More . . .It will also make clear that the Super Delegates will decide the nomination, debunking the myth that the contest is one for who is pledged delegate leader, as opposed to a contest to reach 2025 (or 2214 when FL and MI are included.) [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 3:46 pm
Let's remind Move On and Open Left what Pelosi said: Political prognosticators give Clinton more of a chance of catching, or even surpassing, Obama in the national popular vote but Pelosi argued that super delegates should follow the pledged-delegate, not the popular-vote, leader. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:01 pm
But she has repeatedly made statements betraying that neutrality, including saying a unity ticket is impossible and that the super delegates should overturn the popular vote in favor of the pledged delegate count. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:26 pm
Surely, he isn't suggesting that I do this, since he so firmly believes that delegates, pledged or super, can't go against the will of the people. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 11:53 am
If Obama is the pledged delegate leader and the popular vote leader (as me, Kos and a cast of a thousand bloggers, NBC, etc, expect), then any action by the super delegates to subvert such a result would be outrageous and wrong, imo of course. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 11:30 pm
Cherry-picking quotes from the Constitutional Convention to tar and feather the Democratic Party's use of super delegates? [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:42 pm
MYTH: For Hillary to win, super delegates must "overturn the will of the people. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:26 pm
Kos uses the pejorative term "coup" to describe the Super Delegates not voting for the pledged delegate leader. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
The system is based on pledged delegates and super-delegates. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 9:41 am
Since neither Obama nor Clinton will have the necessary number of delegates to capture the nomination without Super Delegate support, the popular vote contest, though unofficial, becomes significant. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 9:01 pm
A REASON TO SUPPORT OBAMA: Super Delegate Jack Murtha endorses Hillary Clinton. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 4:35 pm
Ponet and I spell out what we think in our column at the Legal Times -- and in so doing explain the differences between the superdelegates who have their position by virtue of their representative capacities and the "super-duper" delegates, who have a much different constituency. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 8:51 am
The super delegates will decide this nomination. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 8:36 am
The answer to over-representation in the Senate surely can't be no genuine representation in the presidential nomination process.And it's not only the "post-Super-Tuesday" states who are benefitting. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:49 pm
I think that is actually what the Super Delegates will look at. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 5:17 pm
"The rules were going in that super-delegates were there to exercise their judgment...as a super-delegate I want to make sure we win in the fall, and I'm gonna take the candidate who can do that. [read post]
