Search for: "Superior Court of Pennsylvania" Results 481 - 500 of 2,967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2019, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
   The Superior Court noted that even an admission by the tortfeasor of admitted alcohol or drug use is subject to being excluded from evidence where the Plaintiff fails to present evidence of chemical testing sufficient to show intoxication, or where the Plaintiff fails to present any other evidence of impairment. [read post]
13 Oct 2003, 2:02 am
In three weeks Pennsylvanians elect a Supreme Court justice and three Superior Court judges. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:31 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Holy Spirit Hospital has prevailed in the Superior Court as confirmed by the Court's Opinion handed down yesterday. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 10:12 am
The Pennsylvania Superior Court has now just affirmed the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, explaining that because Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 12:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that, under Sackett I, 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:34 pm
A decision issued today in the appeal that I argued on October 17, 2006 before a three-judge panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania holding court at the Duane Morris LLP Moot Courtroom of the Temple University Beasley School of Law: You can access today's ruling at this link. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 6:40 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  Here is a LINK to the Tort Talk post on the trial court decision.The Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed after finding that issues of fact precluded the entry of summary judgment. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 5:14 am by Charles Sartain
Co-authors Paul Yale and Rusty Tucker Herein, highlights from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Briggs, et al. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Erin McCarthy Holliday
" In a suit brought against Marcellus Shale gas producer Southwestern Energy [corporate website] alleging trespass and conversion for producing gas under the plaintiffs' land, Senior Judge John Musmanno of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania [official website] explained that Pennsylvania courts have yet... [read post]
31 May 2009, 2:28 pm
The Court noted that the courts of Pennsylvania have long abandoned the "impact rule" previously required for a plaintiff to recover under an emotional distress claim. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:33 am by Linda A. Kerns
 While the statue lists the factors, the trial judge has the freedom to decide which factors are more important, and which factors are less important, in each individual case.Courts must consider the statutory factors when considering a relocation petition.The Superior Court (our appellate court) just affirmed (agreed with) the ruling of the trial court in Erie County, Pennsylvania denying a mother the opportunity to relocate from Erie County to… [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court reversed a trial court ruling after finding that the trial court erred in refusing to give an adverse inference instruction based upon the Defendant’s alleged spoliation of videotape evidence in a grocery store slip and fall case. [read post]
The Superior Court of Pennsylvania recently affirmed an appellant’s conviction of DUI and related charges, holding his arrest based on an informant’s tip was supported by reasonable suspicion, and his conviction was supported by the weight of the evidence. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 7:55 pm
" And The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review has a news update headlined "Democrats post strong leads in PA Commonwealth, Superior court races. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:43 pm
The Pennsylvania Superior Court held that this argument had no merit because the appellant could not show that his claim was preserved for appeal. [read post]
17 Dec 2023, 1:19 pm
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed a trial court’s Order denying a Defendant’s Petition to Open a Default Judgment. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:17 pm
The Superior Court agreed, vacating the portion of the defendant’s sentence permitting such searches of his residence while on probation. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
 In this matter, the trial court and the Superior Court had both ruled that the Defendants were entitled to summary judgment, holding that the Discovery Rule did not toll the statute of limitations because, as a matter of law, appellants failed to establish that they pursued their action with reasonable diligence. [read post]