Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A." Results 481 - 500 of 676
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
Cutter Dodge, Inc., 47 P.3d 1222, 1232 (Haw. 2002), the Hawaii Supreme Court stated:[Plaintiffs] may not recover damages for emotional distress. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:17 pm by Brad Pauley
The following is our summary of the Supreme Court’s actions on petitions for review in civil cases from the Court’s conference on Wednesday, March 16, 2011. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:41 am by Andrew Berger
Andrew will speak at a luncheon program sponsored by the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. on March 16, 2011 on what the copyright supply chain (copyright holders, manufacturers, importers and distributors) should anticipate following the Supreme Court’s deadlock in Costco v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 3:47 pm
The issue of infringement by a separately patented equivalent was addressed in the Supreme Court decision of Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 2:55 pm by Mark A. Spognardi
The Government argued that the National Muffler standard had been superseded by the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 4:55 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Slip Opinion, at 25-26 (“Kwikset packaged its products with labels like ‘All American Made & Proud Of It’ and ‘Made in U.S.A. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:08 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (Benson) (January 27, 2011) --- Cal.4th ----, 2011 WL 240278, the California Supreme Court decided an important standing issue in Unfair Competition Law (UCL) cases post-Prop. 64.In 2000, plaintiff James Benson filed a representative action against defendant Kwikset, alleging Kwikset falsely marketed and sold locksets labeled as “Made in U.S.A. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:35 am by Nathan Koppel
The California Supreme Court yesterday handed a win to plaintiffs -- and a blow to tort reformers -- by letting a lawsuit move forward that claims a company used misleading "Made in the U.S.A. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
," can sue the manufacturer without having to prove that the product was overpriced or didn't work, the state Supreme Court ruled Thursday. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 4:02 am by Walter Olson
Nonetheless, the California Supreme Court has now ruled 5-2 that the proposition does not ban such suits after all, because consumers can claim to be injured by the arguable mislabeling, even though nothing was defective about the lock. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am by Christa Culver
Tyson Farms, Inc.Docket: 10-542Issue(s): (1) Whether an injury to competition must be pleaded and proved to establish liability for violation of § 192(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act; and (2) whether, assuming that § 192 is ambiguous, the courts should have deferred, under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]