Search for: "Sweet v State"
Results 481 - 500
of 991
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2013, 5:36 am
Ganga Bishan (whose nickname was Haldiram), for his business - the manufacture and sale of sweets, papads etc. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 7:15 am
At Georgia State University, I first heard the word to name who I am: transgender. [read post]
2 Jun 2013, 8:36 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 10:05 am
One such deciduous publication which is also, paradoxically, an evergreen is Sweet & Maxwell's European Patent Decisions, the 44th release for which, current to July 2013, landed in this Kat's terrestrial mailbox late last week. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:37 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp & Others, a Chancery Division, England and Wales, ruling last week from Mr Justice Nugee [don't ask: the Kats haven't come across him either, but he is a Chancery judge], addressed an important preliminary issue. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Sweet v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 1:48 pm
The Ninth would like to know.United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm
That was the question the Sixth Circuit had to answer in United States v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Islam, 301 A.D.2d at 345, 751 N.Y.S.2d 449; Brancoveanu v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:17 am
A “Sweet Meteor O’Death” button? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:44 pm
Doe and Baker v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 8:40 am
A. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 4:59 pm
Tower & Sons v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 1:05 pm
In a follow up to last year’s blog entry regarding the case Association of Molecular Pathology, et al. v United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al we continue to look into this potentially revolutionary biotechnology case. [read post]
