Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 481 - 500
of 4,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
It also contravenes the CLRA's statutorily-declared consumer protection purpose by curtailing the CLRA's scope. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 1:02 pm
Essentially, they point to data showing that many consumers use websites to research a product, but end up buying the product from a local retailer. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 12:30 pm
Q: Views v. downloads: people download stuff they don’t watch. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 5:01 am
We wouldn’t get involved in the science, ex post v. ex ante and that sort of thing. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 10:52 am
Plaintiff’s claims under the California consumer protection statutes are governed by the “reasonable consumer” test. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 6:49 am
Demetriades v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:40 am
The MMPA is “ ‘paternalistic legislation designed to protect those that could not otherwise protect themselves,’ ” High Life Sales Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that statutory restrictions on the president’s ability to remove the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau violated the Constitution’s separation of powers. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 6:23 am
See Roca Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
The FDA, like industry, now has to put up or shut up. . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:07 am
Steeplechase Arts & Productions, L.L.C. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 7:37 am
TripAdvisor and Yelp v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 7:32 am
(Art. 79) It doesn’t have to be this way. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
But the same notion of consumer ability to self-protect/make meaning can also be used in product markets, as w/Sheff’s data and the many Tiffanys in the world. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
On 1 February 2023, the General Court of the EU issued two judgments (T-568/21 and T-569/21 – Zoubier Harbaoui v EUIPO) on two trade mark oppositions filed by Google with the EUIPO against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
It would have been preferable to give the Apple v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Should we require secondary meaning before protecting anything at all? [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 10:15 am
Meanwhile, Apple and other tech companies are bolstering the security of their devices in response to consumer demand and the new threats to security cropping up every day. [read post]
