Search for: "T. K."
Results 481 - 500
of 20,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
They clearly do not figure in the plating solution of D1. [2.5.2] Although the definition “comprising” of claim 1 does not exclude such additional components the present application is absolutely silent with respect to an optional addition of such a chelating agent like HEDTA, or of surfactants such as said Chemeen T-15 or Igepal Co-730 (compare point 2.3.1 above), let alone that such components should be added in such considerable amounts. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
This is also true where an error would not have led to a different outcome of the proceedings (see in particular T 144/94 [4]; T 12/03 [4.5]; T 17/97 [8.2]).[1.7] As to the request for remittal to the first instance, under the provisions of Article 11 RPBA the board must remit the case to the department of first instance if fundamental deficiencies are apparent, unless special reasons present themselves for doing otherwise.In the present case, considering that the… [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:01 pm
T 382/92). [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
Reasoning as in T 708/00, an objection under R 137(5) should not have been made. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 986/93 [2.4] and T 620/08 [3.4]). [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
I was looking at my 401(k) balance this week and it struck me that I have no idea how fees and costs are allocated to our plan. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
In 2018, the Province of Alberta and dozens of K-12 school boards sued Access Copyright for a refund of $25 million they allegedly overpaid for Access Copyright licences for 2010, 2011 and 2012. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 11:26 am
"GURUR EÅžEKLÄ°K, KÄ°BÄ°R EÅžOLU EÅžEKLÄ°KTÄ°R"(SAKIP SABANCI) ONUR BÃœTÃœN HAZÄ°NELERE BEDEL BÄ°R… [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
K is for Key Employee. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The appellant refers inter alia to decision T 473/08 (by a different BoA) to point out that “a non-technical problem can have a technical solution”. [read post]
NOW WHAT...ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS / GREEN CARD, OR... DIVORCE, AFTER YOUR K-1 FIANCÉE COMES TO THE US?
23 Nov 2011, 11:29 am
While it is unfortunate, it occasionally happens that when the a potential spouse comes to the US on a K-1 visa the two parties (or at least one of them) just don't click like they thought they would and decide not to go on together as man and wife (as different situation arises if the spouse arrives on a CR-1 marriage / spouse visa...but more on that later. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:01 pm
This was clear from decisions T 305/08 and T 452/05. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:51 am
If that player didn’t want to deal, he would could pass the responsibility by passing the “buck”to the next player. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
T 361/08 [13]).The admission of a request for reimbursement of further search fees that had been paid would lead to the Board dealing with the corresponding questions for the first time in appeal proceedings or remitting the case to the first instance (A 111(1)). [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm
A kind colleague has informed me that Board 3.3.01 has now issued its final decision in case T 584/09.In this case the opponent filed an appeal after the Opposition Division had maintained the patent in amended form.In its first decision, dated February 3, 2011, Board 3.3.01 revoked the patent.The Enlarged Board of appeal (EBA), in its decision R 21/11, set aside the decision because the deciding Board had not been aware of a request (to admit expert opinion D27) and, therefore, had ignored… [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, a transfer of the party status in the course of the proceedings can only be effective when the Board has been requested before the Board to register the legal succession and when the corresponding evidence has been filed (see T 19/97 [5]) – something that could only be done by the [opponent].[7.3] Pursuant to A 104(1) EPC 1973 each party to the opposition proceedings shall meet the costs it has incurred unless a different apportionment of costs is ordered “for reasons… [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm
CHANGE: Retiring Boomers Find 401(k) Plans Fall Short. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 11:00 am
[…] the board concludes that no case of lack of sufficient disclosure of claim 37 has been made. [44] [The opponent] has referred inter alia to decisions T 226/85, T 409/91 and T 694/92 to support his case. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:59 pm
t? [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
It's time for another edition of "Fact or Fiction" a/k/a "Quick Answers to Quick Questions" a/k/a QATQQ f/k/a "I don't feel like writing a long blog post. [read post]
