Search for: "THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF OKLAHOMA, by and through its Judges"
Results 481 - 490
of 490
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2007, 7:46 am
On June 12, 2006, the Supreme Court handed down a ruling in Hill v. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Outside of the five main executing states of Texas, Virginia, Oklahoma, Missouri and Florida, this figure rises to one in five for the remaining 28 jurisdictions that have executed since 1977. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 3:22 am
On the contrary, she prevailed against the plaintiffs' claims.April 23, 2007, Decision and Order Denying RIAA Reconsideration Motion*For those of you interested in reading more from the United States Supreme Court's decision in Fogerty v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 4:19 am
Attorney General Bob Cooper declined through a spokeswomanto be interviewed for this story.His office last week filed court papers asking for a time to be set up whenthe two sides and the judge can talk through the next steps in the case. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
It posits the question "What if instead of ‘Bong Hits 4 Jesus,' the banner had said ‘Bong Stinks 4 Jesus,'" reporting on the oral arguments in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 7:48 am
In addition, Oklahoma remains free to interpret our own state constitution, with its own protection against "unreasonable searches or seizures," more broadly than the United States Supreme Court interprets the federal constitution. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Eighth Circuit's decision limiting a state Medicaid agency to reimbursement from only that portion of a judgment or settlement that represents payment for medical expenses. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Indeed the Netherlands court questioned the investigation's legality.).We are aware of a single instance in which a Magistrate Judge sua sponte rejected the application because there was no basis for its ex parte character. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 1:34 pm
The court also interpreted a Supreme Court decision in 2002 narrowing the right to sue under federal law to support its decision that, even if the state were in violation of its obligation to make proper payments, individuals do not have the right to challenge that violation. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
App., 2006)US Supreme Court certiorari denied by Jones v. [read post]
