Search for: "Taylor v. United States" Results 481 - 500 of 1,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2018, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Of note, the Alberta Court relied on legal developments in the United States in its decision. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:51 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Sunstein, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 7:25 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"[T]he court has significant discretion in determining the proper scope and nature of the response" (People v Taylor, 26 NY3d 217, 224 [2015]). [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 10:43 am by Rory Little
United States; see my preview), the question presented in the second case (United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 8:27 am
  Or, at a minimum, explain why it comes out 180 degrees differently than the opinion of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 5:01 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Polling Issue The United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am by Lisa Ouellette
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employee's resignation after being found guilty of disciplinary charges forfeits his or her right to demand arbitrationMatter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, 169 AD2d 871 Under the terms of a Taylor Law agreement, an employee against whom disciplinary charges had been filed was entitled to a three step disciplinary proceeding. [read post]