Search for: "Tenant v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 3,330
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2010, 10:21 am
The Ahmeds approached Mr Murphy in July 2008, stating that they wished to undertake extensive works of repair and refurbishment. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 4:10 pm
In her decision in Wong v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:02 pm
The right to free and fair elections is a core tenant of American democracy. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 8:15 pm
Later the tenant sent the landlord notice stating that he was exercising the termination clause. [read post]
6 May 2015, 9:43 am
Omni Amelia Island, LLC) protected a commercial real estate tenant's right to maintain its exclusivity provision through each of its lease extension options as stated in the terms of its lease. [read post]
30 May 2012, 11:38 pm
On 29 May 2012, the European Court of Human Rights handed down the judgment in the case Bjedov v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
# # #DECISIONOrmonde Equities LLC v J. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:23 am
Mendoza v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:20 pm
Compare United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 4:17 pm
Osibanjo v Seahive Investments Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 1282 (Court of Appeal) Are there circumstances in which a landlord can accept only part of a cheque offered by a tenant and thereby avoid waiving its right to forfeit? [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
LANDLORD WAS A BIT LATE TO THE PARTYWhen a landlord starts a summary proceeding, state law [RPAPL 735(2)] requires that the pertinent pleadings and affidavit of service be filed within three days after personal delivery or (when substituted or conspicuous-place service is utilized) after any mailings are made to the tenant.In 125 E. 50th St. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 11:00 pm
LANDLORD WAS A BIT LATE TO THE PARTYWhen a landlord starts a summary proceeding, state law [RPAPL 735(2)] requires that the pertinent pleadings and affidavit of service be filed within three days after personal delivery or (when substituted or conspicuous-place service is utilized) after any mailings are made to the tenant.In 125 E. 50th St. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 3:11 pm
Douglas v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:52 am
In Yim v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 6:25 am
By way of example, in Marshall v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 8:56 pm
” Coyle v. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 12:53 am
The Secretary of State is further empowered to issue guidance on the contents of the same, see s.218A(7). [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 9:13 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:25 pm
That was the case in Wang v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:44 am
If the intention is to speed up the eviction process rather than to increase evictions it is not at all clear why the court's discretion to suspend or postpone the eviction has not been retained in circumstances where there is persuasive evidence that the tenant's behaviour will improve, i.e. the only circumstances in which a court should suspend or postpone a possession order under the current discretionary ground (see Manchester City Council v Higgins [2005] EWCA Civ… [read post]
