Search for: "The Florida Bar v. Doe" Results 481 - 500 of 2,236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by Camilla Hrdy
I was happy to read David Simon's new article, Trademark Law and Consumer Safety, forthcoming in the Florida Law Review. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 11:01 am by Jon L. Gelman
Our phased reopening in conditions where case incidence remains high ensures a long and slow recovery, not a V-shaped recovery. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
When the Navajo Generating Station closes, where does the water go? [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:58 pm by Peter Margulies
U.S. asylum officers are in the main dedicated and capable, but judicial review of asylum decisions at the U.S. border is exceedingly limited—limits that the Supreme Court upheld on June 25 in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm by Unknown
When the Navajo Generating Station closes, where does the water go? [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:19 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Walker, 88 So.2d 312, 313 (Fla. 1956), as follows: Continue reading → The post FORT LAUDERDALE BUSINESS LITIGATION: REASSIGNMENT OF ORIGINAL JUDGE DOES NOT BAR REHEARING BY A NEW JUDGE appeared first on Florida Business Litigation Lawyer Blog. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
The only thing this ban does is protect pharmacies from competition. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
This is a low bar, I concede, but it is still important.In this first of a two-part series of columns, I will discuss these newfound reasons for guarded optimism. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Karim Benyekhlef and Nicolas Vermeys
In numerous cases, business solutions were simply tweaked, which implies some limitations since the legal system does not operate like the business world. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:11 am by John Bellinger, Sean Mirski
” On May 11, a district court in Florida dealt a significant setback to prospective Title III plaintiffs, holding in Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Thirty-one states prevent people on parole or probation from casting ballots.Four states permanently bar ex-inmates from voting and do not allow restoration of that right, while eight others disenfranchise only people who have committed particularly egregious kinds of crimes.Sunday’s court decision striking down new barriers erected to limit the number of Florida’s previously disenfranchised population from voting is admirable, but much more needs to be done to ensure… [read post]