Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
The people have made their unequivocal choice.Today we will sign treaties on the accession of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, Zaporozhye Region and Kherson Region to the Russian Federation. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
an application for an interim injunction which he heard, sitting as a judge in the Intellectual Property Community Trade Mark Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Musnuff v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Baze v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 6:36 am
My own view was that this was an obvious due process violation, as the defendant's status as a sex offender was determined at a proceeding which denied him notice and an opportunity to be heard (much as the original SORA classification process struck down in People v David W, 95 NY2d 130 [2000] [holding that the availability of an Article 78 was insufficient to satisfy the requirements of due process as to the level of classification]). [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:36 am
Additional Resources: Giles v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:54 am
Comment This case is significant for two reasons: First, it tasks the Supreme Court with answering the question raised obiter by Lady Hale in Savage v South Essex NHS Trust [2009] 1 AC 653, namely “what is the extent of the state’s duty to protect all people against an immediate risk of self-harm? [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
In Virginia Uranium v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:57 pm
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York heard the case of The People of the State of New York, Respondent v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 4:29 pm
We're talking about a company you've never heard of trading OTC on the "pink sheets". [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 5:13 am
People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
The judge gave permission to appeal on the basis that the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success and that there was a compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
Although there is no question that a trial court "necessarily has broad discretion to control and restrict the scope of the voir dire examination" (People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135, 140, rearg denied 29 NY2d 670, cert denied 405 US 995; see People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199), we conclude under the circumstances of this case that the court erred in failing to permit defense counsel to conduct further questioning of the prospective juror to determine whether she… [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
People v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:28 pm
Also in Tallahassee, Miami lawyers Tara Kawass and Chris DeCoste have started trial in State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 10:16 pm
AutoZone, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:24 pm
Finally, she told me that while Trump v. [read post]
