Search for: "The People v. Officer"
Results 481 - 500
of 22,845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2011, 5:01 am
LEXIS 1238 (May 23, 2011): We hold that, like the officers in [People v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:40 am
” At one point, the account posted the following: We find it suspicious that the day after a North Texas Police Officer is murdered we have received several anti police calls in the office as well as people trying to degrade or insult police officers on this page. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 8:12 am
Lauren Altdoerffer has a post at Crime and Consequences, commenting on a California appellate court's decision in People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 7:19 am
The decision, People v.... [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 4:13 pm
In People v Nieves-Andino, 2007 NY Slip Op 05584, the victim of a shooting who later died, Jose Millares, was discovered lying in the road by a police officer responding to a 911 call regarding a... [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 9:41 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 9:17 am
Steel v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 8:50 am
This case implicates both rules, but the New York Court of Appeals rules in favor of the driver.The case is People v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
Which leads one to believe that, well, maybe, appellant did contend that the officers should have been designated pursuant to Section 801.Which in turn makes me think: Well, what about that?! [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
Particularly when the underlying act (e.g., giving a false name to a police officer) is something that doesn't just happen once in a blue moon. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
So much so that I'm okay with the officers doing a Terry stop-and-frisk for their own protection. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:09 am
Correia,First Assistant Wayne County Public DefenderThe Court of Appeals recently issued a decision on two consolidated cases (People v Brannon and People v Fernandez (2011 NY Slip Op 03676, _ NY3d _ [5/11/11) which set forth the level of knowledge a police officer must possess before, consistent with DeBour, he or she has reasonable suspicion to believe an individual possesses a gravity knife as opposed to a legal pocketknife.In People… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:06 am
Several of the papers in this series will be of interest to Turtle Talk readers, including a unique analysis of Lyng v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Thus, primarily because of the "legal stigma" attached to warrantless and suspicionless stops, the People bear the burden of proving at a suppression hearing that the particular checkpoint in question was conducted in a non-discretionary manner, that is, the officers did not exercise individual discretion as to which cars to stop or what questions to ask akin to People v Cabrera. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 12:59 pm
So what do the police officers do? [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 11:48 am
In some ways, or at least for some people, it may be easier to reverse a death sentence when you have a fair sense that the next jury is likely to reimpose this sentence anyway. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:47 am
Supreme Court in the 1943 case of United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 10:58 pm
So you see, many in office, took the "Oath of Office" and are now, not upholding that "Oath of Office! [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:17 pm
In Majaev v. [read post]
