Search for: "Third Judicial District Court" Results 481 - 500 of 6,141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2023, 9:49 am by Rob Robinson
Data Protection Commissioner (commonly known as “Schrems I”), the court invalidated the Safe Harbor self-certification framework that U.S. companies had been using to conduct data transfers from the EU to the United States.[8] Almost immediately after the court issued the Schrems decision, the European Commission and the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
With this Pennsylvania Supreme Court and its judicial perspective, the plaintiffs bar has been repeatedly successful in convincing the court to overturn decades-long precedent that previously favored defendants.For example, in Cagey v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 10:04 am by Anna Bower
  But the district attorney and her team are nowhere in sight. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:33 pm by Ilya Somin
The judicial unanimity on the merits reduces the likelihood this question will get to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm by Eugene Volokh
Finding itself bound by Pickup, the district court in this case dismissed Plaintiff Brian Tingley's challenge to Washington's nearly identical law. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:27 am by Arthur F. Coon
In an opinion on rehearing filed January 18, 2023, the Third District Court of Appeal reissued its previous published opinion in the Save Our Capitol! [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:52 am by Eugene Volokh
In response to the COVID-19 virus, a federal district court required witnesses to wear face shields rather than masks while testifying. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 10:03 am by Eric Goldman
That’s unconstitutional, and it’s not the proper role of the judicial system. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
" Numerous district courts have recognized a plaintiff's interest in preserving privacy where the allegations concern sexual assault. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
This Court notes that Plaintiff commenced two additional civil actions in the federal District of Colorado (which she does not identify in her Motion): (5) Glapion v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the time this wasn’t a serious problem in the District of Columbia but with the expansion of government employment during and after World War I (and the extension of the federal pension system), it became one as a really large proportion of the District’s population was disqualified. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:06 am by Eugene Volokh
In our study, CSBs were used in 14% of all cases (and only in one district, the Southern District of Florida (Miami)). [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Alison Siegler
Our interviews with judges revealed a striking lack of awareness about how the presumption is legally supposed to operate: When we asked a judge from a district where we had court-watched why it is so rare for courts to find the presumption of detention rebutted, the judge explained: "I don't understand [the presumption]…. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 7:31 am
Special Session of Court -- The Court of Appeal, Third Appellate District, will hear a Special In Memoriam Session of Court on January 17, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., for Justice Coleman Blease, who passed away on November 28, 2022. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 6:06 am by Alison Siegler
While the scope of the problem varies across districts and divisions, in every court that exemplifies this particular crisis, arrestees are jailed without counsel. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
That is partly because most of the business dissolution statutes, including for limited partnerships (see Partnership Law § 121-802), corporations (see Business Corporation Law § 1112), and LLCs (see Limited Liability Company Law § 702), provide that a proceeding for judicial dissolution shall be brought in the “Supreme Court in the judicial district in which the office” of the entity is located. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am by jonathanturley
Indeed, the Government affirmatively argued in the district court that Chevron deference is unwarranted. [read post]