Search for: "Ton v. State"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,042
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 5:47 am
From United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
In many ways, we see general permits as the future of the regulatory state. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:55 am
SPRAWLDEF v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:52 am
<> Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:56 am
This case raises questions about the Fourth Amendment and the right to a fair trial in the Internet age, where everyone is posting everything online, and our personal computers contain more information than the Founding Fathers could have imagined.The case is United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 5:27 am
CERTIORARI DENIED… 13-1012 VANGELDER, TERRY V. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 1:25 pm
Of grave concern was the stationary major source permitting provisions (PSD and Title V programs) which were triggered anytime a source emitted 250 tons or, in case of Title V, 100 tons of a pollutant. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:49 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Asarco LLC v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
In Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 2:47 pm
County v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm
Gordon to as much incarceration as defendants in other ivory smuggling cases, including relatedcases.AUSA LaVerne disagreed with these arguments, expressing in the prosecution's memorandum,An appropriate sentence must reflect, in particular, (i) the seriousness of this offense, which is increasingly the focus of national and global law enforcement and policy efforts; (ii) the importance of general deterrence, which courts have recognized has special relevance in this context; (iii) the… [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:34 am
By 2050, however, the population of the United States is expected to exceed 400 million, meaning that per capita emissions will need to be more than 75 percent below their 1910 level—somewhere in the neighborhood of 2.4 tons of carbon-dioxide-equivalent per year—or to levels not seen since the end of Reconstruction. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:28 pm
SPRAWLDEF et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
It was a very loose construction.[9]*The following day, Madison spoke in support of a six-cents-per-ton duty on commercial vessels, which he argued would be “necessary for the support of light-houses, hospitals for disabled seamen, and other establishments incident to commerce. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:45 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> US v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:00 am
Ontario (Ministry of Labour) v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 8:37 am
Diversity v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:38 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> National Association of Manufacturers v. [read post]
