Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,467
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
United Kingdom and Delfi AS v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:00 pm
S. ___, ___ (2010) (slip op., at 23) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
U. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 5:32 pm
Chemical Foundation, 272 U. [read post]
13 May 2015, 12:51 pm
In this case, however, plaintiff alleges that the use of its mark was in Assara’s advertisement itself, as well as on the face of Assara’s website. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
S. 388 (1983); Witters v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:00 am
The McBride v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 5:55 am
From a two-Justice opinion in the Indiana Supreme Court case Payne-Elliott v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Wainwright and Brady v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am
Those efforts could be viewed as “attempt[s] by the attorney to rectify an alleged act of malpractice” (Luk Lamellen U. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 5:57 pm
Defendant: Mark Thees, The Pinnacle, T's Catering Enterprises, L.L.C., Central Park West, DOES Case Number: 2:2008cv01483 From the Justia Trademark Docket. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:22 am
S. 476, 483 (1957), incitement, Brandenburg v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 6:25 am
First, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s revised decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
” To succeed on a claim for trademark infringement or unfair competition under the Lanham Act, CS must prove that: (1) it owns the mark at issue; (2) the mark is valid and legally protectable; and (3) A1’s use of the mark is likely to create confusion. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:12 pm
("Johnny Cupcakes") is the company which sells merchandise emblazoned with Earle's Cupcake and Crossbones mark. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
The U-T San Diego and Marcia Coyle of the Blog of Legal Times cover last week’s cert. grants in Riley v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 1:14 pm
S., at 117; Bazemore, 478 U. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 9:01 am
Voisine v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Corp. v Kassis, 182 AD2d 22, 27 [1st Dept 1992] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted], lv dismissed and denied 80 NY2d 1005 [1992]; see Foley v Roche, 68 AD2d 558, 567-568 [1st Dept 1979]). [read post]
