Search for: "U. S. v. Test"
Results 481 - 500
of 2,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Bilski v. Kappos: SCOTUS Doesn't Recognize Business Methods Patents But Doesn't Prohibit Them Either
28 Jun 2010, 12:07 pm
Chakrabarty, 447 U. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 12:20 pm
Tanvir, 592 U. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
We need not decide whether such a category exists, because Muñoz cannot clear the second step of Glucksberg's test: demonstrating that the right to bring a noncitizen spouse to the United States is "'deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition.'" 521 U. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:00 am
Matter of Verizon NY, Inc. v Mills, 2007 NY Slip Op 52616(U), Decided on August 10, 2007, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Judge Robert M. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 5:00 am
Supreme Court, Rodriguez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:10 am
"The test of whether a decision is arbitrary or capricious is "determined largely by whether a particular action should have been taken or is justified . . . and whether the administrative action is without foundation in fact.'" (See Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222].Other points made by Justice Feinman:1. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 9:23 am
There might be an "anomaly" in treatment of S. 8 petitions and S. 11 petitions insofar as appeal is concerned but that does not mean that an amendment has to be carried out. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:26 am
Upholding the venue selection clause in Instagram’s TOS. * Chilutti v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
U. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 2:58 pm
Other test cases are on hold in the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am
S. 188 (1972), and Manson v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 3:35 pm
Salary basis test under CA Law The California Court of Appeals in Negri v. [read post]
Medical Treatment Patent Claims Held Patentable Subject Matter Under the Alice/Mayo Section 101 Test
30 Apr 2019, 7:10 pm
V. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:20 am
Tiffany (NJ) LLC, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:06 am
Brach v Levine 2012 NY Slip Op 51312(U) Decided on July 16, 2012 Supreme Court, Kings County Battaglia, J. is an example. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:39 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
