Search for: "U.S. v. Hope*"
Results 481 - 500
of 9,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
It would also seem prudent (though hopefully redundant) for the advance notice bylaw to require that any material information disclosed to the corporation pursuant to the bylaw or director questionnaires also be disclosed to stockholders promptly as part of the proxy statement or pursuant to Rule 14a-12 as a pre-filing solicitation.[8] It appears that nominating stockholders sometimes do not consider themselves bound by Rule 14a-12 until well after the date when notice of a nomination is… [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
[All the Berman quotes in what follows are from Thinking Like an Economist: How Efficiency Replaced Equality in U.S. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:41 pm
See Perez v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:57 pm
Supreme Court decision, Kelo v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 574 (2003) (quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
That women are the peculiar bearers of America’s constitutional failings seems obvious after Dobbs v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
” Yale Professor Jed Rubenfeld and former U.S. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:14 pm
In the lawsuit EEOC v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:59 pm
To recap, the case arose over CareDx's assertion of the claims in U.S. [read post]
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Train, 426 U.S. 167, 178–179, 96 S.Ct. 2006, 2012–2013, 48 L.Ed.2d 555 (1976); Mayo v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 8:51 am
His legal career included filing the first major school desegregation case, Roberts v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 1:05 pm
But the current framework of rules governing Section 101 of the U.S. patent laws, including the Supreme Court’s 2014 CLS Bank v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:13 am
Yet the U.S. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:23 am
From The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 6:40 am
Fund v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:58 pm
So unless UMG is able to stop the Janets of the world from training AI models before they get in the hands of the Chrissys and Jacks of the world, current U.S. copyright law really doesn’t seem to give UMG a ton of options. [read post]
1 May 2023, 3:30 am
There are companies that are delisting from the LSE in favor of the U.S. stock market. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:24 pm
Related Cases: Twitter v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:23 pm
Erin Murphy, counsel in Barnett v. [read post]
