Search for: "U.S. v. Long"
Results 481 - 500
of 25,374
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
This is the second in a hopefully finite series of blog posts about the legal issues in the NetChoice cases, in which platforms raise First Amendment challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm
As I explain in my 2022 book, The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State at 148–158, three of these cases came before the Brand X decision (Maislin Industries, U.S., Inc v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
U.S. history includes a long list of examples where that power has been considered or actually used. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The obstacle to all of that work was the U.S. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented from the cert denial in Coalition for TJ v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In fact, Texas asked the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
For example, in Smith v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
Biden—now Murthy v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:05 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
Jackson Women’s Health 597 U.S. 215 (2022). [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
Higgins, 105 U.S. 580, 591 (1881); Textile Machine Works v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
While I have long admired the detailed work that Professors Tillman and Blackman have done on this topic, I remain unconvinced by their core argument that this term refers only to appointed officials, not elected officials. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
Gaines v. [read post]
SCOTUS Repeated Relisting of a Case on the Meaning of Race Neutrality--and a Plug for my new Article
19 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In May of last year (i.e., before SFFA was decided), the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 3:00 am
State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Palmer would ordinarily go through the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:19 am
Lashify, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 11:41 pm
” That case, now styled Murthy v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]