Search for: "U.S. v. Minor"
Results 481 - 500
of 7,037
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
Kootswatewa had allegedly previously twice been convicted of sexual contact with a minor. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 11:26 am
Even watching you poop.This conduct is insufficiently outrageous to warrant a dismissal of even minor charges against you. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
This is, of course, precisely what the U.S. government, as the plaintiff in United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 7:42 pm
In Eknes-Tucker v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
It tries to justify an end-run around congressionally mandated procedural rights and protections essential for refugees and unaccompanied minors and it does so to achieve an impermissible goal. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Goesel v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:02 pm
The three cases under review are Perry v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
Texas, 378 U.S. 108, and in Spinelli v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:48 am
"'"" LULAC, 548 U.S. at 425, 126 S.Ct. 2594 (quoting Johnson v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
Minority Op. at 2-3. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 3:12 pm
Because, to be honest, some of these opinions -- mostly, if truth be told, in the first category -- seem of incredibly minor importance. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 4:47 am
Sandberg v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:01 pm
When the Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:39 am
McCrimmon, 2012 U.S. [read post]
16 May 2021, 8:34 pm
U.S Customs & Border Patrol (D.D.C.) -- concluding that: (1) except in one minor respect, CBP performed adequate search for records concerning its interactions with Canadians seeking entry to participate in 2017 Women’s March; and (2) CBP’s broad explanations for its use of Exemptions 5, 6, 7(C), and 7(E) did not permit the court to meaningfully review withholdings.May 13, 2021Rutigliano v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 8:26 am
Last June, the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:16 pm
First, a minor correction. [read post]
