Search for: "U.S. v. Under Seal" Results 481 - 500 of 1,390
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2019, 12:51 pm by Wally Zimolong
  (However, there are several compelling arguments that PLAs are invalid under current U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 1:26 am
Kaplan NASSAU COUNTYContractsFour Year Limitations Period Under UCC §2-725 Precludes Recovery; Seller, Installer Granted Dismissal Abbe v. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 4:09 pm by Yogeeta B. Jadhav and Fatih Mercan
Recognizing confidentiality concerns, it was noted that the USPTO does have procedures for submitting confidential information under seal. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 1:48 am
City of New York QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Ineligible for Resentencing Under 2009 Drug Law Reform Act People v. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by Cindy Cohn
FOIA/Government Transparency The Stranger Unsealing Case: The United States government routinely asks courts for electronic surveillance warrants and other orders under seal. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 6:10 am by Matt Cooper
The campaign asks the court to remand the case to the Wisconsin legislature for the purpose of determining a remedy according to its authority under the Electors Clause of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 4:14 am by Edith Roberts
Rigsby, in which the court ruled that a violation of the seal requirement does not mandate dismissal of a suit brought under the False Claims Act, maintaining that although the “Court, in its concluding remarks, sought to address the concerns … that failure to require mandatory dismissal for violation of the seal would encourage relators to harass defendants into settling claims by leaking embarrassing stories to the news media,” “given the extreme… [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:46 am by Dennis Crouch
Holland L.P., however, the court apparently found that approach untenable and instead issued decision on August 1 under seal: Sealed Judgement and Opinion. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States ex rel Rigsby, which involves the effect on a lawsuit under the False Claims Act of a violation of the act’s seal requirement. [read post]