Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Michael"
Results 481 - 500
of 1,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
“Scarcely any political question arises in the United States,” he wrote in Democracy in America, “that is not resolved, sooner or later, into a judicial question. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 3:01 pm
The United States has previously insisted that the troops in Iraq are stationed there for advisory roles only. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Alyass, Harvard University, “The People’s War on Drugs: Community Activism, the Carceral State, and the Crack Crisis in 1980s Detroit”Michael Z. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 2:05 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom EWCA: Unlicensed imprecision: Pink Floyd v EMI Records (1709 Blog) (IPKat) Just sue them! [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:38 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf considers the non-implications of the oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:27 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 4:44 am
Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In addition to his many important decisions, Story’s three-volume Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States was and remains extremely influential.Neither Marshall nor Story is an uncomplicated hero, however. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Gear, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 9:43 am
The United States represents every citizen, so “everybody” is literally true. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 7:44 am
<> CERCLA Contribution; The Confusion Continues - In the words of Justice Thomas in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
Gould, Michael D. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Although it was no longer unanimous, five years later the Court reached the same conclusion with respect to a New Jersey anti-discrimination law in Boy Scouts of America v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 8:38 pm
Zund America Inc., et. al. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 12:51 pm
Last year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided largely in favour of Mr. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 3:37 pm
Among the participants is Michael Fysh QC, former Patents County Court judge and now reborn as an arbitrator and mediator. [read post]
