Search for: "UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, Hawaii"
Results 481 - 500
of 524
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
Citizens of the islands are citizens of the United States. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
United States Attorney's Office, which omits confirmation that the prosecution must prove the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 4:38 am
(g) there is any other basis consistent with the constitutions of this State and the United States for the exercise of personal jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:57 pm
Related posts:Doll Wastes No Time, USPTO Considers Deferred Examination John Doll has wasted no time moving forward to try and put his stamp on the United States Patent OfSolving the Patent Crisis and PTO BudgetI am extremely encouraged by the fact that the US Patent Office seems to be increasingly coming undeFederal Circuit to Hear Patent Office AppealTomorrow, December 5, 2008 at 10:00am the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal… [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 11:32 am
Developer Jesse Spencer through his venture MVI, LLC, is proposing a 1,100 unit residential project for Maalaea, Maui, Hawaii. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Substantive questions should be directed, in writing, to the Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, DC 20543.For those who have asked for an email address for Shepard Smith of Fox News, it is: Foxreport@Foxnews.com. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
He grew up in New York in modest economic circumstances, left college to enlist in the armed services and on February 19, 1945 landed on a small island called Iwo Jima and fought there as a United States Marine in the bloodiest battle of World War II. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 2:31 pm
Then again, the SCOTUS could always review it to see if the opinion violates the Admission Act or the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 11:05 am
These arguments have been made in op-eds, blog posts, and even in the briefs of the parties and amici. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:21 am
Patrick's Day in United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:13 am
The transcript is posted here. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 6:07 pm
No. 40, a resolution "Urging the Governor and the Attorney General to withdraw the appeal to the United States Supreme Court of the Hawaii State Supreme Court decision, Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 8:05 am
SCOTUSblog posts "Argument Preview: Hawaii v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 7:31 pm
Office of Hawaiian Affairs, No. 07-1372 (cert. granted Oct. 1, 2008). [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 12:42 pm
Here's the short version: In 1993, Congress and the President adopted a resolution ("Apology Resolution"), in which the United States apologized for its role in the overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii in 1893. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:50 am
App. 85a) -- this train of legal reasoning unless it repeals at least two prior congressional enactments: (i) Congress's 1898 decision in the Newlands Resolution to accept "the absolute fee and ownership" to these lands from the Republic of Hawaii and (ii) Congress's 1959 decision in the Admission Act to transfer to the State "the United States' title" to all lands "that were ceded to the… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:17 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 164 (1979), a case argued and won by my Damon Key colleagues Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:44 pm
Following up on the earlier post New SG Unlikely To Alter Fed Gov't's SCOTUS Arguments In Ceded Lands Case, which noted that the new Solicitor General has sought leave from the Supreme Court to participate in oral argument and for divided argument, here's the motion filed by the SG's office on January 29, 2009, which reveals that the Obama Administration does not appear to be materially altering arguments the federal government set forth in the… [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 6:19 am
The issue then would seem to be whether a bargaining unit can bargain away a right against random drug testing. [read post]
